{ "$schema": "https://google.github.io/A2A/schemas/agent-card.json", "name": "RelayLaunch", "description": "RelayLaunch helps local service businesses get found in AI-assisted search, get booked, and keep the customers they already have, in that order. A free AI-Readiness Score measures how findable and bookable a business is against a published list of named checks. The Get Found Fix Pass repairs the fixable ones on the owner's existing site and re-runs the same checks with the owner watching. Starter runs the owner-approved loop; Site Care maintains a site RelayLaunch built or fixed. Every action is owner-approved before it reaches a customer. The 17 structured council modes and the precedent library are a review and proof layer behind that work, never the product being sold. Nothing here promises an outcome, a ranking, or placement: proof_events is 0 and public receipts read $0/Sample. Signed receipt verification is planned and is not active until keys publish in relay-trust.json.", "url": "https://deck.relaylaunch.com", "provider": { "organization": "RelayLaunch LLC", "url": "https://www.relaylaunch.com" }, "version": "2.2.0", "supportedInterfaces": [ { "type": "mcp", "url": "https://deck.relaylaunch.com/api/mcp", "authentication": "bearer", "description": "Protected Relay Deck MCP endpoint for owner-authorized clients." }, { "type": "web", "url": "https://www.relaylaunch.com", "description": "Public website discovery and read-only browser agent helpers." } ], "pricing": { "currency": "USD", "canonicalAsOf": "2026-08-19", "tiers": [ { "id": "ai_readiness_score", "name": "AI-Readiness Score", "monthly": null, "oneTime": 0, "note": null }, { "id": "starter", "name": "Starter", "monthly": 199, "oneTime": null, "note": null }, { "id": "team", "name": "Team", "monthly": 999, "oneTime": null, "note": null }, { "id": "enterprise", "name": "Enterprise", "monthly": 3000, "oneTime": null, "note": null }, { "id": "fix_pass", "name": "Get Found Fix Pass", "monthly": null, "oneTime": 350, "note": "one-time, nothing renews" }, { "id": "onboarding", "name": "Full Onboarding", "monthly": null, "oneTime": 5995, "note": "one-time, optional" }, { "id": "site_care", "name": "Site Care", "monthly": 149, "oneTime": null, "note": "optional, month-to-month" } ] }, "commerce": { "selfServeCheckout": false, "note": "Collection is founder-handled. No self-serve payment action is exposed on any buyer surface." }, "honesty": { "proofEvents": 0, "publicReceipt": "$0/Sample", "outcomeClaims": false, "guaranteedPlacement": false, "note": "Scores are self-assessed and advisory. No recovery rate, conversion lift, or guaranteed placement is claimed." }, "capabilities": { "streaming": true, "pushNotifications": true, "stateTransitionHistory": true, "webhooks": true, "embeddableWidgets": true, "precedentSearch": true }, "authentication": { "schemes": [ "bearer" ], "credentials": "API key via Relay Wire. BYOK supported for model provider keys." }, "defaultInputModes": [ "text" ], "defaultOutputModes": [ "text" ], "skills": [ { "id": "strategy-room", "name": "Strategy Room", "description": "OODA Loop methodology. Observe-Orient-Decide-Act cycle for strategic decisions. Agents run parallel OODA loops, surface conflicting orientations, and converge on actionable strategy through structured debate.", "tags": [ "strategy", "ooda", "competitive", "decision-making" ], "examples": [ "Should we enter the European market in Q3 or wait for the regulatory framework?", "What's our best competitive response to the new entrant?" ] }, { "id": "innovation-lab", "name": "Innovation Lab", "description": "Design Thinking methodology. Empathize-Define-Ideate-Prototype-Test cycle for creative problem-solving. Agents explore the problem space before converging on solutions.", "tags": [ "innovation", "design-thinking", "product", "ideation" ], "examples": [ "How should we redesign the onboarding flow to reduce churn?", "What product features would differentiate us from competitors?" ] }, { "id": "risk-council", "name": "Risk Council", "description": "Monte Carlo methodology. Probabilistic risk assessment using scenario modeling. Agents assign probability distributions to outcomes and identify tail risks that deterministic analysis misses.", "tags": [ "risk", "monte-carlo", "probability", "scenario-planning" ], "examples": [ "What's the probability-weighted downside of this acquisition?", "Model the risk scenarios for our supply chain expansion." ] }, { "id": "due-diligence", "name": "Due Diligence", "description": "M&A Framework methodology. Full evaluation framework for major decisions: partnerships, acquisitions, large investments. Structured like institutional due diligence with financial, operational, and strategic lenses.", "tags": [ "due-diligence", "m-and-a", "investment", "audit" ], "examples": [ "Conduct due diligence on TargetCo at 8x EBITDA.", "What are the top 5 risks in this vendor partnership?" ] }, { "id": "ethics-board", "name": "Ethics Board", "description": "Kantian + Utilitarian methodology. Dual-framework ethical analysis. Agents apply both deontological (duty-based) and consequentialist (outcome-based) reasoning, then surface where the frameworks disagree.", "tags": [ "ethics", "compliance", "ai-governance", "privacy" ], "examples": [ "Is it ethical to use customer data for model training?", "Evaluate the stakeholder impact of this workforce reduction." ] }, { "id": "growth-council", "name": "Growth Council", "description": "AARRR Pirate Metrics methodology. Acquisition-Activation-Retention-Revenue-Referral framework for growth strategy. Each agent owns one metric and argues for prioritization.", "tags": [ "growth", "marketing", "metrics", "revenue" ], "examples": [ "Where is our biggest growth lever: acquisition or retention?", "Design a referral program that improves our AARRR metrics." ] }, { "id": "technical-review", "name": "Technical Review", "description": "Architecture Decision Records methodology. Structured technical decision-making using ADR methodology. Agents evaluate context, options, and consequences to produce a defensible architecture decision.", "tags": [ "architecture", "engineering", "tech-debt", "adr" ], "examples": [ "Should we migrate from monolith to microservices?", "Evaluate the architectural trade-offs of this database choice." ] }, { "id": "market-intelligence", "name": "Market Intelligence", "description": "Porter's Five Forces methodology. Competitive landscape analysis using Porter's framework. Agents assess competitive rivalry, supplier power, buyer power, threat of substitution, and threat of new entry.", "tags": [ "market-analysis", "competitive-intel", "porters", "industry" ], "examples": [ "Analyze the competitive landscape for AI-powered CPA tools.", "What's our defensibility against new market entrants?" ] }, { "id": "crisis-response", "name": "Crisis Response", "description": "Incident Command methodology. Incident Command System adapted for business crises. Structured rapid response with clear roles, communication protocols, and escalation paths.", "tags": [ "crisis", "incident-response", "emergency", "recovery" ], "examples": [ "Our main API is down affecting 500 customers. What's the response plan?", "We've discovered a data breach. Walk us through the incident response." ] }, { "id": "investment-committee", "name": "Investment Committee", "description": "DCF + Comparables methodology. Investment decision framework combining discounted cash flow analysis with comparable transaction benchmarks. Quantitative rigor meets qualitative judgment.", "tags": [ "investment", "valuation", "dcf", "capital-allocation" ], "examples": [ "Is this Series A term sheet fair at a $20M valuation?", "Should we allocate capital to R&D or sales this quarter?" ] }, { "id": "quality-assurance", "name": "Quality Assurance", "description": "Six Sigma methodology. Six Sigma DMAIC process for quality improvement decisions. Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control applied to business processes and product quality.", "tags": [ "quality", "six-sigma", "process-improvement", "operations" ], "examples": [ "Our customer support resolution time increased 40%. Root cause?", "Apply DMAIC to our invoice processing pipeline." ] }, { "id": "research-council", "name": "Research Council", "description": "Scientific Method methodology. Hypothesis-driven decision-making using scientific method. Agents form hypotheses, design experiments, predict outcomes, and evaluate evidence.", "tags": [ "research", "scientific-method", "experiments", "evidence" ], "examples": [ "Design an experiment to test whether freemium converts better than trial.", "What hypotheses should we test about our pricing model?" ] }, { "id": "competitive-analysis", "name": "Competitive Analysis", "description": "Game Theory methodology. Game-theoretic competitive strategy. Agents model competitor moves, identify Nash equilibria, and recommend dominant strategies accounting for multi-player dynamics.", "tags": [ "game-theory", "competitive", "pricing", "strategy" ], "examples": [ "If our competitor drops prices 20%, what's our optimal response?", "Model the game theory of entering a two-player market." ] }, { "id": "policy-council", "name": "Policy Council", "description": "Regulatory Impact Assessment methodology. Policy and regulatory decision analysis. Evaluates compliance requirements, regulatory risk, and the cost-benefit of policy options across multiple jurisdictions.", "tags": [ "policy", "regulatory", "governance", "compliance" ], "examples": [ "Should we adopt a mandatory AI ethics review for all new features?", "Evaluate the impact of implementing SOC 2 compliance." ] }, { "id": "supply-chain", "name": "Supply Chain", "description": "Network Optimization methodology. Supply chain resilience and optimization analysis. Agents map dependencies, identify single points of failure, model disruption scenarios, and recommend diversification strategies.", "tags": [ "supply-chain", "logistics", "resilience", "sourcing" ], "examples": [ "Where are the single points of failure in our current supplier network?", "Model the cost-benefit of dual-sourcing our top 5 SKUs." ] }, { "id": "talent-council", "name": "Talent & Culture", "description": "Organizational Design methodology. People strategy and organizational design analysis. Agents evaluate team structure, culture dynamics, talent acquisition, retention levers, and succession planning.", "tags": [ "hr", "org-design", "retention", "talent" ], "examples": [ "Our top engineer just gave notice: what's the bench plan and re-recruitment play?", "Audit our org chart for span-of-control gaps before we hire 15 more." ] }, { "id": "esg-sustainability", "name": "ESG & Sustainability", "description": "Impact Assessment methodology. Environmental, Social, and Governance analysis for strategic decisions. Agents evaluate climate risk, social impact, governance quality, and alignment with reporting frameworks.", "tags": [ "esg", "sustainability", "climate", "reporting" ], "examples": [ "Which ESG factors are financially material to our pricing decision?", "Map our current disclosures against SASB and TCFD requirements." ] }, { "id": "deliverable-generation", "name": "Deliverable Generation", "description": "Turn a completed council review into a written summary: the recommendation, the dissent, the points that did not reach agreement, and the sources each claim rests on. Internal review output, not a certified or audited report.", "tags": [ "reporting", "summary", "audit-trail" ], "examples": [ "Summarize this council review with its dissent and open questions.", "List every source behind the claims in this review." ] }, { "id": "ops-health-scan", "name": "Operations Health Scan", "description": "60-second assessment of business operations across 16 Rooms. Returns scored results with specific recommendations.", "tags": [ "assessment", "operations", "scoring" ], "examples": [ "Run an ops health scan for a 15-person CPA firm.", "Assess our marketing and sales operations." ] }, { "id": "friction-audit", "name": "Friction Audit", "description": "Analyzes a business process for four friction types: cognitive (too complex), effort (too many steps), trust (users doubt the result), recovery (cannot undo mistakes). Returns a scored friction map with reduction recommendations.", "tags": [ "process-improvement", "ux", "operations", "consulting" ], "examples": [ "Audit our client onboarding process for friction.", "Where is our invoice-to-payment pipeline creating unnecessary effort?" ] } ] }